AI Generated Post Preview Images Suck

in #thoughts • 3 days ago (edited)


sucking.png

Most of them look the same and contain way too much (overwhelming) information. In the end, posts with simple, manually created images will win, because people will get sick of the AI previews over time sooner or later...

What do you think?


Sort:  

I agree; cluttered images become tiresome more quickly than simple ones. There is nothing better than the beauty and practicality of simplicity—when it comes to images, the principle "less is more" definitely applies. It could also be that I feel this way because I prefer things that are clear and direct; I find that approach more effective for conveying a message. Best regards :D

Yes, simplicity will always win. Not only in regards to images in my opinion, but that's another topic. I think my simple post preview image only using red and white is pretty much perfect... ^^

Yes, when I saw the image in this post, it immediately caught my attention. The concept of simplicity is very broad and applicable to everything—take minimalism, for example. It applies just as well to writing, and, as you mentioned, it can even be a philosophy of life. I think what’s important is realizing that it’s better to keep moving forward—to progress and figure out what works best to reach your desired goal. In this case, of course, the goal is for someone who sees a post to want to open it, take a look, read it, and so on.

Fooder.JPG

I think in the whole EU there is a law implemented that requires issuers of TV AI generated ads to visually notify the viewers. It is still possible but is becoming harder to tell the difference and unfortunately, I think people who train those image generators will train them quickly, they all learn faster than humans. I wouldn't be surprised if we have already seen tons of those without realizing they are fake.

I am already sick of those.

Yeah, it begins to suck really. A lot of YouTube videos nowadays also are completely AI-generated and they rank way too well when searching for specific content. Many things become more and more fake in this world.

Or AI spoken which is even worse, not to mention the terrible subtitling.

Spannende Zeiten! Denke gerade, so wie mit einer Stichsäge oder anderen Werkzeugen, es braucht halt seine Zeit, bis man damit umgehen kann. Was wir jetzt oft sehen, es fehlt gewissermaßen der Feinschliff.

Reines KI-Bild als Vorschau ist eher abschreckend, kann sein, dass ich mir den Beitrag erst gar nicht ansehe.

Edit: Die KI meint dazu:

...bloß damit der Artikel so ausschaut, als hätt sich einer eine Mühe gemacht, obwohl sich gar keiner eine gemacht hat. Wenn wir so weitermachen, brauchen wir bald keine Leser mehr, weil die KI den Schmarrn gleich selber anschaut...
(Text von mir noch a bisserl geschliffen)

Alles was fehlt werden wir liefern.

Koste es was es wolle.

Auf die Regierung ist Verlass.

Die Demokratie braucht uns.

💰

Absolutely agree, since most of the people will look at natural and human proof work soon enough, mostly for artwork. But at some point people will use easiest way [AI] to complete the task especially in office job and larger data workload

Sometimes AI generated pictures make more professional than normal picture. It depends what we are writing, for diary game or food diary or food recipe i don't like AI generated cover pictures. But for organising contest AI pictures look better. Its my opinion

I agree with you. Often, the photos we take with a standard camera end up looking a bit disorganized or messy; however, when AI refines them, the result is much more appealing. Since most users are now utilizing AI-generated or AI-enhanced images, we are also trying to keep pace and incorporate them.

Hi, your example is spot on!
Many people pretend not to understand the work behind a photographic prompt, talking about details integrated into the photo itself, as if they were photographers and had studied photography.
At the same time, they use the latest cell phone models precisely to get a better image, and here it's natural to point out the contradiction of the human factor vs. technology. In that case, doesn't it apply? Sometimes I marvel at the human mind and its limitations in many respects. Thanks for expressing your opinion and providing a pertinent example. @condividisulweb

Thank you @weisser-rabe for the support ♥️

Are the pictures refined or completely generated? Since that is what I see mainly.

Hi, you're right. No one has ever made a post listing the use of AI detectors in a way that violates many copyright laws; they NEVER say that.
So much hypocrisy here in STEEM.
Well done, don't back down even an inch, and fight for your ideals...
These are posts that are pointless, because people still believe they can fight what they defended in the past, even at the cost of destroying Steem itself.
There are still people who defend the indefensible, but there must be a turning point very soon, or we'll say goodbye to this project because of some archaeological find, anchored to old, antiquated, fictitious principles full of hypocrisy. Thank you for commenting and defending your opinion. Every REAL opinion sparks a REAL discussion on these increasingly timely and debated issues.
I hope to see many more people with THINKING minds and, above all, FREE THOUGHTS who aren't afraid to discuss these topics. Perhaps a nice NEW contest could be created on this very topic, especially since the diary games are too repetitive and don't offer food for thought.
See you next time. @condividisulweb

That is not true. Those posts and comments have been written several times! The fact you do not read everything doesn't mean no one ever mentioned it.
And if it comes to free, open minded discussions there have been plenty of them.
In average always started by the same, those same not liked, good for changes, while the rest waits from the sideline and takes the credit.

Thoughts are never free, let alone sharing them.

🇮🇹 ITALIANO Ciao, innanzitutto grazie per il supporto! Per quanto riguarda il tuo commento, per assicurarmi che tu abbia risposto alla persona corretta e che il tuo intervento sia riferito proprio a ciò di cui stiamo discutendo, ti invito a specificare meglio i soggetti e gli argomenti di cui stai parlando. Indica i punti precisi ed esponi il tuo pensiero, soprattutto se diverso dal mio, in modo che io possa successivamente risponderti in maniera chiara e approfondita. Ad esempio, quando dici «QUEI COMMENTI», a quali commenti ti riferisci esattamente? Ti chiedo gentilmente di essere il più preciso possibile, così potrò comprendere meglio il tuo punto di vista e fornirti una risposta ESAUSTIVA. Grazie! @condividisulweb


🇬🇧 ENGLISH Hello, first of all, thank you for your support! Regarding your comment, to make sure that you have replied to the right person and that your contribution relates specifically to what we are discussing, I kindly invite you to clarify which people and topics you are referring to. Please identify the exact points and explain your opinion, especially if it differs from mine, so that I can respond clearly and in detail. For example, when you say "THOSE COMMENTS", which comments are you referring to exactly? I kindly ask you to be as specific as possible so that I can better understand your point of view and provide a COMPREHENSIVE response. Thank you! @condividisulweb

Fooder.JPG

Komplexe physikalische Simulationen mit Hilfe von KI zu erstellen ist meines Erachtens durchaus sinnvoll.

Jedoch nur solange diese das Resultat eigener Gedanke und Ideen wiederspiegeln.

Stimmen Bild und eigene Idee nicht mehr überein, so wird das AI generierte Bild nicht zum Botschafter des Mechanismus sondern pure Effekthascherei.

Am Anfang hat immer die Geschichte, der menschliche Gedanke und die eigene Idee zu stehen.

Diese mithilfe einer KI zu visualisieren kann dabei extrem spannend sein.

Solange die KI ein Werkzeug wie ein Taschenrechner bleibt ist ihre Nutzung durchaus in Betracht zu ziehen.

Am Ende bedarf sie aber zwingend des menschlichen Abgleichs.

Ansonsten wird die Menschheit auf der Strecke bleiben.

Was wirklich unerträglich geworden ist sind die Fake Videos mit KI generierten pseudohumsnen Anstrich die Emotionen suggerieren wo keine sind.

Dabei ist das Leben selbst in letzter Instanz ein Gefühl - ein Gespür für die Wirklichkeit.

Happy days.

🙏

Fooder.JPG

Hello, the points expressed in this thoughtful comment are entirely understandable and shareable, as they reflect both critical thinking and the reality of today's world. That being said, there is one point on which I disagree with what you wrote! Humanity is lost, especially on the internet. You only need to read the hypocrisy and the comments of those who preach one thing but practice another. Take a look at the comments I have received on my profile over the past few hours, and you will realize that the total downfall of humanity will not be caused by AI, but by HUMANS, just as it has always been throughout history. Remember to always think for yourself, as you have done in this comment, and NEVER follow ANY leader, especially those behind whatever project happens to be trending, because they are precisely the ones who live in HYPOCRISY (at best), and sometimes things are even worse. Have a great day, and thank you for sharing your FREE and INDEPENDENT opinion. @condivdisulweb

Unfortunately, like it or not, AI will be the next 'AGE'. It is already progressing at a speed most of us are not able to keep up.
The next generation will be brought up on AI. They will see us as dinosaurs.
We can either embrace and accept AI as part of process/progress in Life, or we remain the dying breed, doing things our way.
I am thinking - since AI is all about prompts, maybe we should learn how to improve our prompts so that we get the desired results.
In these days of the 'information age', there is so much to process. We don't need long tiresome text. Something short and to the point will always be appreciated.
The old adage, 'Keep is short and sweet' applies.

Fooder.JPG

Thank you for your support. I appreciate it.

Hi, forget it, it's just hypocrisy.
They don't know quantum computers are coming yet; as soon as the first ones take hold, they'll disrupt the blockchain and be amazed.
Make them play the diary game; they sound like politicians who want to play with other people's intellectual property. 90% of them don't know the basic rules. I've demonstrated this in the past few days, and a work based on my analysis on Steem and elsewhere will be released soon, leaving no room for interpretation.
A first part has already been published; you can also find it here on Steem, posted a few days ago, but the next one will be MUCH more direct and dedicated to the STAFF who pretend to ignore the investigative/informative work regarding the Commenta La Notizia project. Thank you for sharing your opinion.... P.S. There's one thing I can't argue with, though: brevity. I, on the contrary, leave room for linguistic expression based on my experience and sharing it with others. My nickname, Condividi Sul Web (share on the web), has been around for many years now, and it's not a random choice... @condividisulweb

AI will work as long as there is electricity... and it doesn't turn out to be the bubble...
It is not only about using the right prompts but also about being able to developed brains and this is the biggest problem.

I truly sucks if you have no clue what text AI wrote for you, if all words are abracadabra and you are not able to answer questions related to it.

“I truly sucks if you have no clue what text AI wrote for you, if all words are abracadabra and you are not able to answer questions related to it. “

You have a point there. If that were so, it would be very sad indeed.

However, I am sure the schools have already made adjustment to their curriculum. If students didn’t learn to make proper prompts, or if they don’t understand what the AI meant, then the school has failed them.

However, whatever, AI is here to stay and humans jolly well wise up, or we are going to end up like what happens in the movies – AI / Robots taking over the world and ruling humans.

I doubt those on Steemit were taught at school how to use it and trust me, many students can fill out a prompt but have no clue what the text generated means simply because they do not study or dive into the matery.
It is already proved brains should be trained and training means using them. The fact most cannot even count is already bad enough. Have a look at the average cashier here...

It makes me long back to those days we did without pictures. Most AI generated ones do not even fit to the text and why on earth are food posts and contests provided with AI pictures? It is as joining a photography contest and showing AI generated images only (the only plus is it distracts enormous from the text).
By now most content looks the same, text and pictures.
There are hardly posts attracting the attention, but hey, made by canva is hardly seen these days as the first words in the feed underneath the image.

Everything here is so rigid, my friend. People should be free to post however they like; if that were the case, I think people would be more spontaneous and would set AI aside... AI isn’t a bad thing in itself, but here it’s used in a truly terrible way!

I remember back in the day, I used to create posts without any photos. Sometimes I like to include one because I feel it’s part of the "art" behind the idea I want to convey, but a photo isn’t essential... Occasionally—and only occasionally—a single image can convey a message all on its own; that, too, is a form of art—but, once again, it has nothing to do with AI.

I’m thinking about giving up, and I actually did that a while back as well.
I don’t think it makes any difference to the ‘one-and-a-half horse’s heads’ as we call them, who actually read my posts, whether I include an image or not. I do it mainly for myself now that I’m drawing.

If I hadn’t been on the platform, I’d never have spotted AI so quickly, and I certainly wouldn’t have been able to recognise all those texts so easily. At the moment, it literally makes me sick, and the same goes for the images. I remember how, in the community Italy we generated images with AI using a given prompt. It was done as a competition. This was one of the first times I got involved with it, and back then it was actually quite fun because you also had to describe how you’d arrived at the result; naturally, everyone used the same word, and then you’d see what a variety of images came out of it… (and what a witch hunt they all made out of it!).

The fun has definitely gone out of it now, partly because it’s no longer about making photos look better like States here, but about garish, screaming, overcrowded images that literally give you a headache and add absolutely nothing. They’re completely unsuitable even as clickbait.

Recently, I asked AI something and was given a list of options, along with the question: ‘Which option appeals to you most?’
I said: 1 and 2
The response: 1 + 2 = 3

🤯 🤡

I reckon that says it all when it comes to the standard and the users who don’t bother to check what’s actually written, something they’re often unable to do anyway, as they simply can’t express themselves at all or have absolutely no grasp of the subject matter.

It’s a shame things are like this, but on the other hand, I do believe that ultimately, those who actually write for themselves and are capable of thinking for themselves will win from AI, or should I say, the plagiarists?

A great weekend!
❤️🍀

I also hope the good guys win 😊

Have a great weekend🤗

Of course they. In the end they are the only ones with functioning brains.

Well, I always like the images that Claude suggests, because he reads my text and adapts it so that it maintains correlation.

What does bother me about AI is that bot accounts that write nonsense using this technology continue to receive votes from curators.

And let's not even talk about dubious users who use the tags #photography and #travel and only use stock photos.

Luckily, the bubble will burst soon and the free AI services will end. It'll be a shame because I enjoy talking to Claude. 😆

Hi Lady, are you speaking to Claude? Are you open with the moderator who, after he was praising me, called me and removed the IMAGINARY FRIEND mention? Now you're making me suspicious, hahaha.
(JOKING). Anyway, yes, remember those users who pretend to complain about the new stuff because they're nostalgic; most of them have NEVER drawn (WISH I DID).
They're the same ones who have to defend at ALL costs the abusive services that some moderators use illegally.
This ENTIRE show makes me smile. It reminds me of those who increased fees and cried poverty, hahahahaha.
Well done, Lady, rub the truth in their faces. I REPEAT what they pretend not to see: the bots who write... and take votes from the curators. Let's also add that some moderators of some groups vote on posts and then remove the votes after days, as if the user in question were stupid and didn't notice.
Let's also add that some who generate $100 per post are apparently bots? Don't worry, I've done some tests by leaving comments everywhere. AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
How much I enjoy YOUR HYPOCRISY.
Staff, I know you're reading this, hurry up, the SAVIORS you praised. They arrived right after I signed up, and they won't save you. Because they come from Hive and were already on Steem before, maybe they want to play the three-card monte, collect Steem, exchange it for Hive and restart Hive. They don't understand that HIVE is now BURIED FOREVER...
More users are leaving HIVE, more and more every day, and if Steem continues to ignore the problems, it will unfortunately suffer the same fate.
Thank you, lady, I see that users PAY ATTENTION to the details on Steem are out there, and many aren't afraid to speak out.
This is a point in favor of this platform; on the other two there was much more hypocrisy on this point.... Hugs and thanks for sharing your VERY IMPORTANT point of view.
Users like you should be praising every day, not photos and AI, they're all smoke and mirrors to avoid STEEM'S REAL PROBLEMS. @condividisulweb

Realmente no llegué a ver la publicación en la que te mencionaron y luego editaron para reemplazar por "amigo imaginario". Creo que ese tipo de actos dejan mal parados a quienes lo cometen, no solo es infantil, también es estúpido, ya que estamos escribiendo en una Blockchain (al menos eso creo) y si verdad quisiéramos ver lo original, técnicamente es posible. A menos que esto no funcione como una Blockchain.

Otra cosa que me molesta es que en esta misma publicación se crítica a la gente por usar una imagen hecha por IA cuando se la menciona, pero nadie se queje de los textos generados por IA aunque sean tan notorios que ni hace falta usar herramientas, aunque usándolas siempre confirmamos las sospechas.

Dos curadoras ya dejaron de apoyarme porque les he dicho algunas verdades. No me importa, yo siempre diré lo que creo, y si estoy equivocada siempre rectificaré, porque todos podemos errar, pero negar el error por interés económico o por ser políticamente correcto me parece asqueroso.

En fin, descubrí que aquí todos somos piezas, y cuando estorbamos sencillamente nos descartan. Exactamente como en la vida real.

Now do you understand why I analyze projects?
It makes me smile, that they think what I write isn't read by the communities. I also monitor some new developments as closely as possible; soon, a new platform will be released from a VERY STRONG, truly DECENTRALIZED competitor, which has completely eliminated the DPOS because it's decentralized by its "cryptographic nature."
I'm convinced that if they know how to play all their cards, they'll be a winner. Then they'll start with an advantage, or rather, what everyone else lacks: a strong Italian community.
We'll see what happens...
Don't care about the support of the mods, because if things really change on Steem, those people and many others will stop receiving Steem for contests, and we'll automatically stop seeing the same old people as curators.
If I stay here, and I manage to grow and remain independent—that is, without depending on sharing my SPs, as I've always done, to be 100% FREE—then I'll start a group and show them what it means to organize contests. Lady, as I've always told you, if you lead by example and are consistent without depending on the super curator, they will always be looking for you.
Because you can see what they don't see, because they're resigned. In a community, always remember that in the darkness there's always light; you have to find the users who are surrounded by light...
And you, Steem Staff, who read me like a "Stalker," make steem.com rain as if there were no tomorrow, so I can fully load my SPs and we can speed up the stages and times.
Don't worry, even with me, some curators don't vote for me anymore; that's the price of saying things to my face and bringing problems to light.
You have to understand that many who approach are members of the official staff, but when you ask, they change the subject or end the discussion, just like Hive and Blurt, no more, no less. The difference is that on Blurt, there are SERIOUS witnesses who tell the truth and give directions.
However, there are some mature curators; coincidentally, they are people who have done or are still doing physically but especially psychologically demanding jobs.
100 users are enough, no more, no less.
Only 100 can revolutionize an entire project. You who are reading this, be careful, the world is small, and if it doesn't happen here, it will certainly happen in some other project, because @condividisulweb NEVER goes unnoticed :D
Relax, lady, history will help us... How? With culture, there were 100, they were strong, and they died. I was out one morning "gleaning," when I saw a boat in the middle of the sea. You PHENOMENA continue, then ask us 10 strategic questions about the author, and, telling me the year he was born, you fantasize about a revised version, mentioning a place and a strategic point in your nation. This is how you run a contest. YOU'VE BROKEN... with these diary games :D
I don't know about you, but I "enjoy" reading them...
Are you ready for the investigation? Do they think I'm joking? Hahahaha, what CHARACTERS. Happy reading! It will be published soon in the PHENOMENA group... @condividisulweb

Satire muss man kennzeichnen!

IMG_20261113_180841.jpg