RE: Exquisite Corpse #5 — Assembled
Right… That’s a wealth of interesting ideas, each of which – on its own – would have deserved to be explored in more detail. To me, putting them all together now just results in a creative jumble, with no further benefits…
One question: I’d understood the conditions to mean that our own contributions had to begin exactly with the three words taken from the ‘previous speaker’. However, I’m now finding these missing from most of the openings… In some sections, I can’t find these three words at all. Have you sometimes left them out? Or have I interpreted the rule too strictly?
The delegations for the participants are on their way again: you all are brilliant!
Don’t be surprised: the delegations from the first round are now a month old and are being withdrawn. So there’ll be some ups and downs in your accounts if you’ve been regular participants. Of course, I’d love to let you keep the delegations for longer, but if I did, I’d eventually go bust ;-))
Hi! My memory isn't that good, but I think I remember that the instruction was to receive 3 words, which would be the starting point for writing, however, you shouldn't start with those same three. I interpreted it as clues; perhaps the rules need to be clarified further?
0.00 SBD,
0.15 STEEM,
0.15 SP
Okay, thank you. It was my mistake, but not a big problem ;-))
It was probably my mistake due to an ambiguous translation or because I understood it in my own way. I must read everything with a dictionary carefully. Thank you for pointing that out.
0.00 SBD,
0.15 STEEM,
0.15 SP
Here we go:
0.00 SBD,
0.09 STEEM,
0.09 SP
Thanks for the delegations, appreciate your efforts to keep this going.